Abedallah Alhaj
Palestine & Israel

US–Hamas Cairo talks end in deadlock amid Gaza ceasefire disputes

Cairo meeting exposes rift over Israeli violations, aid blockade and sequencing of Gaza deal

Jummah

The first direct talks between Hamas and the United States since the October 2025 Gaza ceasefire concluded in Cairo without tangible progress toward advancing the agreement’s second phase, Palestinian sources confirmed on Friday. The landmark discussions brought together Hamas Gaza chief Khalil al-Hayya, Egyptian officials, UN envoy Nickolay Mladenov, and US senior adviser Aryeh Lightstone, marking the first such face-to-face engagement since the truce took effect more than six months ago. While the very fact of these talks represented a significant diplomatic opening, the United States has long refused direct engagement with Hamas, the meeting ultimately exposed the fundamental obstacles that continue to block a durable peace. Central among them is Israel’s persistent violation of its own commitments under the first phase of the ceasefire, violations that have cost hundreds of Palestinian lives and left the humanitarian situation in Gaza in a state of deepening crisis.

Israel’s Daily Violations

Palestinian sources report that since the ceasefire came into effect on October 10, 2025, Israel has failed to meet key obligations on a near-daily basis, including halting attacks and allowing agreed levels of humanitarian, food and medical aid into Gaza. According to the Gaza Health Ministry, these daily violations have resulted in the deaths of 766 Palestinians and injuries to 2,147 others. The ceasefire agreement, endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2803, adopted on November 17, 2025 was never meant to be a mere pause in hostilities; it was intended to lead toward a permanent end to the war through a second phase that would include a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, the territory’s reconstruction, and a comprehensive prisoner exchange. Instead, Israel has continued military actions, restricted aid deliveries, and blocked the entry of reconstruction materials and heavy equipment needed to clear rubble, all in direct contravention of the spirit and letter of the agreement.

Washington Looks Away

While Israel has systematically violated the ceasefire, Hamas has fully honored its side of the bargain. Palestinian sources confirmed that Hamas has completed the release of all living Israeli captives and the return of bodies, despite the immense difficulties of operating in a territory that remains under Israeli military occupation. This stands in stark contrast to Israel’s refusal to complete even the limited withdrawals required under the first phase. The so-called “Yellow Line”, a designated Israeli withdrawal line separating eastern areas under Israeli control (roughly 53% of the enclave) from western areas accessible to Palestinians remains violated, with Israeli forces having advanced into additional areas inside Gaza in breach of the agreement. Gaza’s power plant has remained non-operational since October 2023, and the Rafah Crossing, while nominally open, remains under strict restrictions, with an estimated 22,000 wounded and sick individuals requiring treatment abroad while only around 50 people leave Gaza daily.

The US Proposal

The proposal presented during the Cairo talks, described by a Palestinian source as “unfair,” adopted Israeli demands while overlooking Palestinian interests and humanitarian needs in Gaza. “The paper ignored Israel’s commitments under the first phase, of which only a limited portion has been implemented,” the source said, noting objections from Hamas and other Palestinian factions. At the core of the dispute is the question of sequencing. The United States and Israel insist that the second phase has already begun, arguing that it started with the return of the last hostage in January 2026 and that Hamas must now agree to complete disarmament as a precondition for further Israeli withdrawals or reconstruction efforts. Hamas, however, views this as a fundamental imbalance in the ordering of priorities. A senior Hamas source told CNN that the proposal “reduces the whole process to a single clause – disarmament – while other first phase obligations are postponed or marginalised,” adding that “Israel’s security first, while Palestinians’ humanitarian, political, and administrative rights are postponed”.

The Specter of More Violence

Most troubling, Palestinian sources reported that the tone of the US delegation carried implicit threats of resuming the war. According to the sources, Nickolay Mladenov, the high representative for Gaza on the US-led Board of Peace, has conveyed warnings that a refusal to accept the current disarmament proposal could result in a return to full-scale conflict. “It even reached the point where Mladenov conveyed veiled threats: Accept the paper or face a return to war,” a Hamas source told CNN. Such language, delivered in the context of a ceasefire that was supposed to offer Palestinians a reprieve from the devastating military campaign that has killed more than 72,000 people in Gaza since October 2023 is deeply troubling. It suggests that the United States, rather than acting as an honest broker, has aligned itself fully with Israeli demands, threatening renewed violence if Hamas does not capitulate.

SCROLL FOR NEXT