Adidas Accuses Australia's White Fox of Trading Off Its Reputation in Suit

The German sportswear giant alleges White Fox's four-stripe clothing infringes its trademark
Adidas Accuses Australia's White Fox of Trading Off Its Reputation in Suit
[H&CO / Unsplash]
Updated on: 
2 min read

Adidas has accused Australian fashion retailer White Fox of exploiting its reputation by selling clothing featuring four stripes that allegedly resemble the German sportswear company's trademarked three-stripe design.

The dispute, now before Australia's Federal Court, centres on whether White Fox's designs could mislead consumers into believing the two brands are commercially associated.

White Fox denies infringing Adidas's trademark and maintains that its stripes are decorative rather than a brand identifier.

Trademark Dispute Escalates

Adidas alleges that White Fox has sold and advertised clothing featuring four parallel stripes of equal width since at least March, despite repeated requests to discontinue the designs.

The German company argues that the products are deceptively similar to its established trademark, which has been registered in Australia since 1957.

During Friday's court hearing, Adidas's lawyers accused White Fox of attempting to benefit from the sportswear company's reputation.

Evidence submitted included comparisons of clothing designs, promotional advertisements and images showing White Fox products alongside genuine Adidas footwear.

Adidas also alleged that an online advertisement featuring White Fox socks and Adidas shoes was subsequently digitally altered to remove the footwear's distinctive stripes.

The company is seeking damages, including profits generated from the disputed products, interest and legal costs.

White Fox Challenges Allegations

White Fox's lawyers rejected the infringement allegations and indicated that the company would challenge whether consumers could reasonably confuse four decorative stripes with Adidas's trademark.

The retailer intends to reference comparable designs sold by other fashion brands, including Cotton On, Glassons, Sportscraft, Princess Polly and Shein.

Although White Fox has not formally filed its defence, its representatives maintain that the disputed stripes serve a decorative purpose.

The case follows Adidas's successful 2013 Australian lawsuit against Pacific Brands involving four-striped footwear.

Founded in 2013, Sydney-based White Fox has expanded internationally, including into the United Kingdom in 2024, while developing a growing American presence.

The retailer reported AU$542 million in revenue for the year ending June 2025.

A trial lasting three to four days is expected early next year.

Adidas Accuses Australia's White Fox of Trading Off Its Reputation in Suit
New York Sues Kalshi, Calls Prediction Markets Illegal Gambling Operation
Adidas Accuses Australia's White Fox of Trading Off Its Reputation in Suit
UEFA Votes To Boycott FIFA Over World Cup Investment Plan
Adidas Accuses Australia's White Fox of Trading Off Its Reputation in Suit
EU Tells Instagram, Facebook to Change Addictive Features or Risk Fines
Inter Bellum News
interbellumnews.com