The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is intensifying its efforts to break up Google, as outlined in a revised proposal submitted to federal Judge Amit Mehta. Echoing last year's stance, the DOJ insists that Google should divest its popular web browser, Chrome, and possibly its Android operating system, following a landmark ruling that deemed Google a monopolist.
In its latest filing, the DOJ describes Google as an "economic goliath" that undermines consumer choice in the marketplace. The department argues that divesting Chrome is essential to fostering competition, allowing rival search engines to gain access to a vital user gateway. Additionally, the DOJ continues to advocate for changes in Google's Android business practices, suggesting that the company must either modify its operations to encourage competition or sell the operating system altogether.
While the DOJ's proposal retains many elements from the previous administration's approach, it also reflects some concessions. For instance, the DOJ is now open to allowing Google to compensate Apple for services unrelated to search and has dropped the demand for Google to divest its artificial intelligence investments. Instead, the DOJ recommends that Google notify federal and state officials before proceeding with AI-related investments.
In response, Google has proposed an alternative that avoids selling Chrome. Instead, it suggests that the court impose restrictions on its agreements with mobile manufacturers and carriers, preventing Google from mandating pre-installed software on devices.
As both parties prepare to present their arguments in April, the outcome remains uncertain, with significant implications for the tech giant and the broader landscape of digital competition.